Paste a source — a title, an existing reference, or a citation from another style — and get it correctly formatted for IEEE in seconds. No signup required to try it.
Unlike other generators, we confirm your source is real before formatting it — cross-checked against 6 academic databases instead of taking whatever you paste at face value.
*Free account, no credit card — 50 credits/month (1 credit per verification, 4 per citation search).
We found 24 citations. 2 flagged as potential hallucinations.
Uploaded files aren’t stored — they’re processed for this scan and discarded once it completes. See our Privacy Policy.
IEEE style is the numbered citation format used across electrical engineering, computer science, and most IEEE journals and conference proceedings. Instead of an author-year pair like APA, sources are marked in-text with a bracketed number — [1], [2] — assigned in the order each source first appears, not alphabetically. The reference list at the end matches those numbers in the same order. A typical journal entry reads: A. Author, "Title of paper," Abbreviated Journal Name, vol. X, no. X, pp. XXX–XXX, Month Year, doi: XX.XXXX/XXXXX. Author initials come before the surname, the paper title sits in quotation marks, and the journal or conference name is italicized and often abbreviated (e.g. "Proc. CVPR" for a computer vision conference).
Most citation generators will format whatever you paste in, whether or not the source is real. We check your reference against OpenAlex, Crossref, Semantic Scholar, PubMed, DBLP, and arXiv first, looking for independent agreement between sources, before handing back the formatted IEEE citation. If we can't confirm it, we tell you rather than silently formatting a source that may not exist.
An IEEE reference list entry generally follows: [#] A. Author, "Title of paper," Abbreviated Journal Name, vol. X, no. X, pp. XXX–XXX, Month Year, doi: XX.XXXX/XXXXX. In-text, sources are cited with a bracketed number, e.g. [1], rather than an author-year pair.
By order of appearance, not alphabetically. The first source cited in your text becomes reference [1], the second becomes [2], and so on — even if that means the author list in your reference section isn't alphabetized.
Paste in what you already have — the fuller the reference (title, authors, journal or conference name), the more reliably we can verify it against academic databases before formatting. A DOI included alongside the rest of the reference helps confirm the match; a bare DOI or URL with nothing else attached is the least reliable input on its own.
Yes. A free account includes monthly credits for citation verification and citation search, no credit card required.
Guides on catching hallucinated citations, comparisons of the tools available, and case studies from peer review and grading.
AccuraCite Now Has an MCP Server
AccuraCite now ships an MCP server for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients — the consensus verification engine, not a single tool call, exposed over MCP.
We Benchmarked AccuraCite's Citation Finder Against Raw AI — Here's What We Found
We tested AccuraCite's Find Citations feature against a naive AI answer and a naive title match, on claims about obscure, recent research. The grounded pipeline won by a wide margin.
What Is a Retracted Citation, and Why 'Verified' Doesn't Mean Safe to Cite
A citation can be 100% real, correctly matched, and still be a paper you shouldn't cite. Here's what a retraction is, how AccuraCite detects it across three databases, and two real cases that prove it works.
What Is DOI Verification, and Why a Real DOI Isn't Enough
A DOI that resolves isn't proof a citation is real. Here's what DOI verification actually checks, the ways a DOI can be wrong, and how to check one properly.
AccuraCite Catches 99.4% of Fake Citations — Here's the Leak-Free Benchmark
We tested AccuraCite against 918 real citations, including citations built specifically to be hard to catch. It caught 99.4% of the fakes.
How to Check Citations as a Peer Reviewer (Before You Sign Off)
Reviewers rarely have time to check 60 references by hand. Here's how to bulk-verify a manuscript's citations before you submit your review.
The Best AI Citation Checkers in 2026: What We Could Actually Verify
We compared AccuraCite, Citely, GPTZero, and CiteTrue as citation checkers, verifying vendor claims directly instead of repeating unconfirmed numbers.
How to Find Sources for a Claim When AI Can't Back It Up
Asking ChatGPT for a source often returns a hallucinated citation or a real paper that doesn't back your claim. Here's how to find sources that actually do.
Why AI Citation Checkers Get Fooled by Fake DOIs (And How We Fixed Ours)
A citation-verification tool told us a famous 2017 paper was published in 2025 by a fake publisher. Here's the real bug, and the fix AccuraCite shipped.
Seven Fake DOIs, One Famous Paper: A Warning for Journal Editors
A real duplicate DOI impersonates a famous 2017 paper seven times over in Crossref. What it means for verifying manuscript references before publication.
How to Check If ChatGPT's Citations Are Real Before You Submit
Did ChatGPT give you real sources? Here's how to check every citation in your own paper before you submit it, in one pass instead of Googling each by hand.
Why 'Just Use an LLM with MCP Tools' Doesn't Solve Citation Hallucination
MCP lets an LLM call academic APIs directly. That sounds like it solves citation hallucination. It doesn't, by itself — here's the actual failure mode, with a real example.
How to Check Your Students' Citations for AI Hallucinations
Turnitin catches copied text, not fake sources. Here's how to bulk-check student papers for AI-hallucinated citations in one pass, without manually looking up every reference.
Free, in seconds — and every export format from BibTeX to APA is included too.
Create a free account to get 50 credits/month (1 credit per verification, 4 per citation search).
Log In / Sign Up